Stephen King

Horror movies are innately conservative, due to the fact that they are not real.  Writers intend for these stories to seem realistic, in one way or another.  Unfortunately however, Hollywood cannot fully capture the true emotions and mercilessness of the horrors in real life.  The nightmarish happenings in these films have insaner monsters and sicker deaths than that of what is commonly seen throughout a normal lifetime, but they still do not have the power to give you the horrible feelings of something not as severe.

A revolutionary element shows itself quite obviously, after seeing such kind of film one will usually end up being spooked by someone who looks similar to a horror movie character.  Undoubtedly these sort of assumptions affect our society everyday.  We view particular kinds of people as creeps when a scarring impression remains in our minds.

Anarchy unmasks itself in every horror movie, as when nothing follows guidelines, nobody takes the right path, everybody kills each other or gets killed, all because the opposite of peace is arising somewhere on the set.  With all these components working together in an cooperative way.  Horror movies are unquestionably the most exciting movies to watch, nevertheless, excitement is not always the most important factor.

Doublespeak

Answer to question 2 : Lutz states there are four questions to ask that will unmask doublespeak.  The first one asks "Who is saying what to whom?" which will help determine the situation by knowing exactly what is going on.   After that comes Lutz’s second question “under what conditions and circumstances” this question reveals the benefits of the circumstance.  As when people doublespeak they do it only to benefit one side or another.  As for the third “with what intents” the sinister strategy will be unveiled.  To decipher doublespeak, the purpose must be out in the open.  Lutz gave a fourth and final question “with what results?” to expose any doublespeak embedded by examining what happened in the end.  Looking at a recent result can make any doublespeak obvious.

Answer to question 3 : Euphemism is the first term used by the author in “First Kind of Doublespeak” .  He claims it is “an inoffensive or positive word or phrase used to avoid a harsh, unpleasant, or distasteful reality”.

Next, jargon is mentioned.  Lutz writes “pretentious, obscure, and esoteric terminology used to give an air of profundity, authority, and prestige to speakers and their subject matter”.

The third term is gobbledygook.  He claims in 1974 Alan Greenspan used the technique by saying “It is a tricky problem to find the particular calibration in timing that would be appropriate to stem the acceleration in risk premiums created by falling incomes without prematurely aborting the decline in the inflation-generated risk premiums”.